January 11th I was advised at the ppd station to file for a restraining order against Daniel Robillard who had verbally assaulted me on January 5th at my home and refused to leave in front of two officers who had arrived after Theresa Palano thought I had called the police on her and Dan for threatening me and rushing to my home to intimidate me. I went to district Court that morning to file my own protection order against a former Crack dealer who physically and sexually advises every person that he comes in contact with and that is Daniel Robillard who has been found guilty of domestic assault and dealing Crack and steroids in 2007 in one of the biggest busts in pittsfield history. My mother intercepted that at the court house and before I was able to defend myself legally I was given an order that was already modified and decided on without any representation and no hearing. I'm awaiting a hearing now that I'm told already occurred. When i asked judge Tyne what criteria was met she replied "i feel the criteria has been met. " I asked based on what and she replied "I find it sufficient. " there have been no incidents. The only incident detailed by Helene (my abusive mother who historically supports Daniel) was one incident of hearsay that was an obvious lie. I still need to have a hearing on this. I'm homeless in an arctic blast, a once in a generation life risking event. I'm not only the victim, but the details Helene exclaimed that I was concerned with corruption and collusion. This is only further evidence of these things. I arrived at court on January 20th when my heating was scheduled. Plaintiff did not arrive. Tyne was not present. I was told that my hearing had already happened on the very first day I ever heard any notice of an order or summoning to court. No documentation was delivered to me. No notice to arrive at the courthouse. Only a fully decided upon order that fits no criteria.