I am writing to bring to your attention the alarming state of affairs within the American judiciary, where corruption and misconduct are eroding the very foundations of our democracy. The officers of the court in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, The First District Court of Appeal, The Third District Court of Appeal, and The Florida Department of Revenue have engaged in decriminalizing the omission of critical information while misrepresenting material facts both to and by the court. This has left me defenseless against attorneys, magistrates, and judges' criminal, illegal, and unjust intentions.
My experience in Case# 2018-001572-FC-28 serves as a harrowing case that exemplifies the pervasive corruption within the American legal system, primarily the family law court system. Five years ago, my former attorney, Renita Henry, admitted to omitting Delaware State Tax, Wilmington City Tax, and Mandatory Retirement salary deductions during a Title IV-D child support case. These omissions constituted a blatant breach of Florida Statute 61.30, Florida Statute 839.13, and R. Regul. FL. Bar 4-3.3, amounting to a misrepresentation of material facts to the court and thereby initiating fraud on the court. Despite ethical guidelines prohibiting lawyers from knowingly making false statements to a tribunal or failing to correct false statements, The Florida Bar shockingly supported my former attorney's actions. This betrayal of justice was compounded when General Magistrate Deborah Nabat Frankel, General Magistrate Gina Mendez Locke, Judge Scott Bernstein, and Judge Samantha Ruiz Cohen of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida adjudicated court orders, all the while ignoring my concerns about omitted salary deductions.
Fraud on the court commenced at the second temporary hearing on January 28, 2019, where General Magistrate Deborah Nabat Frankel, possessing knowledge of the omissions, adjudicated a verdict while insisting that the judge would allow for the calculations to be compliant with Florida Statute 61.30. However, at the initial final hearing on April 29, 2019, Judge Scott Bernstein also adjudicated a fraudulent verdict and advised me to file an appeal of his decision.
Through these verdicts, delivered while operating under color of law, I have suffered inconvenience through four suspensions of my driving license and one suspension of my motor vehicle registration, with both currently suspended indefinitely. Additionally, Judge Samantha Ruiz Cohen has rejected my Motions for Recusal and Change of Venue, while threatening me with a Writ of Bodily Attachment if I fail to comply with the violations of my civil and constitutional rights.
Although the law stipulates that any verdict made through fraud on the court must be vacated, General Magistrate Gina Mendez Locke and Judge Samantha Ruiz Cohen have repeatedly refused to apply those laws. The latter dismissed two motions to vacate judgments that I had filed with the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida. Furthermore, Rule 60(D)(3) states that there is no statute of limitation in matters relating to fraud on the court because of its egregious nature. Instead, on May 4, 2023, at the third temporary hearing, General Magistrate Gina Mendez Locke would allow opposing counsels, Emily Phillips and Amelia Lyn Warchal, to submit exhibits that included calculations known to have excluded Delaware State Tax, Wilmington City Tax, and Mandatory Retirement salary deductions, representing yet another breach of Florida statutes 61.30 and 839.13. There would be a further violation when Judge Samantha Ruiz executed a Court Order on June 11, 2023, that decriminalized the act of omitting my salary deductions.
